All benchmarks
Head-to-head
Ox Alpha vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is fast and plugged into X; Ox Alpha answers with double the context and a free preview, trading away raw speed.
xAI
The verdict
Grok 4.6 is quick, agentic and cheap, with native access to real-time X data. Ox Alpha answers with double the context window and a free preview, at the cost of raw throughput. If your work is latency-sensitive or depends on live social data, Grok is the pick; if it's long-context reasoning on a budget, Ox Alpha wins comfortably.
Side by side
The same figures from our full benchmark table, narrowed to two columns.
| Metric | Ox Alpha | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 59* | 61 |
| Agentic coding | 78* | 74 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 131K | 64K |
| Throughput (tps) | 24* | 120 |
| Price / 1M out | $0 | $6 |
| Multimodal | ||
| Open weights | ||
| Free to use |
Where Ox Alpha wins
- Double the context window (1M vs 500K)
- Free during preview vs $6 per million output tokens
- Higher max output tokens
- No account required to start
Where Grok 4.6 leads
- Much higher throughput (tokens per second)
- Native, real-time access to X data
- A few points higher on composite intelligence
Which should you choose?
Pick Ox Alpha if
You need the largest context and free access, and latency isn't critical.
Pick Grok 4.6 if
You want the fastest responses or live data from X.
Other match-ups
Try Ox Alpha free
No account, no card, no VPN — open the chat and compare for yourself.